New Takings Case - Murr v. Wisconsin

 
From: "Neil Lindberg via Utah Chapter APA Listserv" <utahapa@PROTECTED>
Date: June 24th 2017

Yesterday the U. S. Supreme Court issued a potentially far-reaching opinion in Murr v. Wisconsin. Five of eight Justices (Gorsuch did not participate) determined that a lot merger requirement was justified and that denial of a building permit on one of two adjacent, but substandard lots owned by the Murr family did not result in a taking. ScotusBlog has links to analysis and commentary on the case.

  • This mailing list is a public mailing list - anyone may join or leave, at any time.
  • This mailing list is a group discussion list (unmoderated)
  • Start a new thread, email: utahapa@cachempo.org

Utah Chapter APA

Privacy Policy:

Email addresses will not be shared or sold.